中文国产日韩欧美视频,午夜精品999,色综合天天综合网国产成人网,色综合视频一区二区观看,国产高清在线精品,伊人色播,色综合久久天天综合观看

決勝六級--簡答+改錯7

時間:2023-05-04 15:28:58 大學英語 我要投稿
  • 相關推薦

決勝六級--簡答+改錯(7)

 

TEST 7

??

Years before President Bill Clinton came to Washington with his campaign pledge to spend an additional $20, 000 million annually on America’s infrastructure “to develop the world’s best communication, transportation, and environmental systems,” economists and others were talking about the need to spend more on public works. Their debate has been almost entirely about one question: how much more? Usually overlooked in these discussions is the real infrastructure dilemma of the 21st century—not how much to spend but how to decide what to build and where to build it. ?

For several reasons, the old ways of deciding these matters simply do not work anymore. Americans today are far more skeptical about the value of new roads, bridges, and sewagetreatment plants especially when they are located in their own backyards. Their faith that decisions about public works can be safely left in the hands of public officials, engineers, and other technical experts are gone.

Reflecting in 1985 upon the final demise of Westway, the proposed highway along Manhattan’s West Side that had been held up for 30 years, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York wrote, “there is a kind of stasis that is beginning to settle into our public life. We cannot reach decisions. Central Park could not conceivably be built today as it was when there was enough power in (government) to make the decision. We don’t have that capacity. ”?

The persistence of the public works pork barrel— funding blatantly political projects—has also contributed to public skepticism. In the same year that Moynihan decried the death of Westway, local politicians celebrated the opening of

the $1, 800 million Tennessee?Tombigbee Waterway, recently described by the Atlanta Journal Constitution as “a broken promise. ” A classic pork barrel project, the waterway carries only one?tenth the commercial barge traffic that had been projected.

Questions:

?1. Eco

【決勝六級--簡答+改錯7】相關文章:

決勝六級--簡答(4)05-04

決勝六級--簡答(1)05-04

決勝六級--簡答(2)05-04

決勝六級--簡答(3)05-04

改錯05-01

決勝04-30

大學英語六級短文改錯考點考察類型總結05-04

改錯優(yōu)秀作文05-02

大學英語六級考試成段改錯試題的考點效度分析05-02

決勝豈止在賽場05-02